
Claude Design is the fastest design tool I have used, and without some setup it produces the same generic website as everyone else's. This post covers what it is, how to set it up properly in an agency, and where it fits in the work.

Claude Design: the brief in the chat panel on the left, the result on the canvas on the right, built in the AWIA design system.
Anthropic released Claude Design on 17 April 2026. It is a design tool driven by conversation. You describe what you want in a chat panel, Claude builds it on a canvas next to the chat, and you refine it by asking for changes, commenting on a particular element or moving things around directly. The output is working HTML, CSS and JavaScript rather than a static image, which means a prototype is clickable from the start. It exports to PDF, PPTX and HTML, sends to Canva and a few other tools, and can hand off to Claude Code for build. It is included in every paid Claude plan.
It is not a replacement for Figma. There is no pen tool, you cannot freely move elements around the way you would in a design tool, and there is no native export to Figma. It is best used for the early part of a project, where you want to explore directions and produce something clickable quickly, with a designer reviewing and finishing the work.
The design system step is the one I would not skip. Without it Claude has nothing to work from, so you get a generic looking page with default fonts and colours that could belong to anyone.
Set up one design system per client, publish it and select it for each project. The quality of the output depends on what you feed it, and in my experience this is the order that works:
Once it is set up, ask for a simple landing page and check whether it looks like the brand before using it on real work.

The AWIA design system in Claude Design: wordmark, brand colours, neutrals and the component list down the left.
In practice, the early part of a design job (concepts, wireframes, prototypes, first drafts) gets a lot faster. The later part, where taste, polish and checking come in, still needs a designer.
It is also worth being clear with clients about scope. Claude Design suits a landing page or a small site. A large engagement with a full sitemap involves dozens of templates and a content model, and that is still a job for Figma and code. On a project like that, I would use it to concept the two or three templates that set the direction and then move on.
It uses a lot of your plan's allowance. Building one section at a time and asking for small changes rather than full rewrites helps, as does keeping design and coding in separate conversations.
I would keep Figma as the source of truth. Claude Design does not push designs into Figma, so there are two ways to connect them. To keep working on a design in Figma, open the Claude Design output in Chrome and capture it with Figma's Chrome extension, which brings the page onto your canvas as editable layers. For the build step, you can skip the canvas and use Figma's Dev Mode MCP server with Claude Code. If your design system already lives in code, /design-sync and the handoff bundle give you a tighter loop than going through Figma at all.

Four ways Claude Design connects to Figma and code: capture the output into Figma with the Chrome extension, hand off to Claude Code, or pull a coded design system in with /design-sync.
The first is confidentiality. Client work should sit on a Team or Enterprise plan, because on those plans your content is not used for training. Claude Design does not yet offer audit logs or data residency, so I would keep NDA-bound and regulated clients out of it for now. It also helps to give one person the Claude Design Admin role so each brand's design system has a single owner.
The second is accessibility. A peer-reviewed study, "Generated Inaccessible", ran 21,880 checks on AI-generated interfaces and found 29% WCAG compliance. Colour contrast passed 26.8% of the time. So run every output through axe or the WebAIM contrast checker before a client sees it. Australian government and enterprise clients expect WCAG 2.1 or 2.2 AA, and the responsibility for meeting it sits with the agency, not the tool.
I would also tell clients you use it. Explain that it sits in exploration and drafting, and that a designer reviews and finishes everything they receive.
Written by: Jamie Esterman Crumb & AWIA Board Member
The Australian Web Awards recognise excellence across six core disciplines: Accessibility, Content, Design, Development, SEO, and User Experience. Subscribe to AWIA’s newsletter for 2026 awards updates, AWIA news and accessibility events as they’re released.



